<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:biotech.blog.co.uk,2009-11-08:/</id><title>bacteria</title><link rel="self" href="http://biotech.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/posts/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://biotech.blog.co.uk/"/><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-08T09:59:30+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:biotech.blog.co.uk,2007-02-07:/2007/02/07/bacteria~1697069/</id><title>bacteria</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://biotech.blog.co.uk/2007/02/07/bacteria~1697069/"/><author><name>biospectra</name></author><published>2007-02-07T13:09:48+01:00</published><updated>2007-02-07T13:09:48+01:00</updated><content type="html">	&lt;p&gt;Many &lt;u&gt;human&lt;/u&gt; proteins are not as good as they might be because the gene sequences that code for them have a double role which slows down the rate at which they evolve, according to new research published in PLoS ...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://biotech.blog.co.uk/2007/02/07/bacteria~1697069/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</content></entry></feed>
